Does shared hosting hold some benefits over a VPS? [closed]
I was looking a for a windows host for my ASP.NET MVC app and the prices in softsyshosting looked very decent. However i fail to understand, why do they offer codename “Enterprise” Shared hosting at the same price point as the codename “Economy” VPS ?
Enterprise Shared: http://www.softsyshosting.com/windows.aspx
The First Economy VPS: http://www.softsyshosting.com/windows-vps.aspx
Why would someone be willing to pay the same amount of money for 350GB less bandwith, less database storage, less disk space, no RDP control .. ?
Generally speaking, the main benefit of shared hosting is that you are not responsible for operating system maintenance, library/application server patches, security, etc.
Conversely, VPS hosting offers more flexibility in configuration, and depending on the provider, offers higher performance. (though this may not always be true)
Check more discussion of this question.
Related posts:
- Does a VPS mitigate risks of a DDOS attack versus shared hosting?
- Need a helpful/managed VPS to help transition from shared hosting
- ASP.NET MVC shared web hosting recommendations? (Alternatively, good Windows VPS providers?)
- steps to build up a windows server 2008 shared hosting [closed]
- So I’m moving from shared hosting to a VPS..what do I need?
Leave a comment
Recent Posts
- Is there a way for administrators to disable users from installing Firefox extensions?
- Is there research material on NTP accuracy available?
- How to create a limited “domain admin” that does not have access to domain controllers?
- Can Windows RDC admin users be immune from being kicked?
- Domain Administrators account policy (After PCI audit)





