Enabling hardware virtualisation BIOS; anything to beware?
A lot of recent virtualisation tools can either make use of, or demand, BIOS support (Intel-VT, AMD-V, etc). But in most of the BIOS screens I’ve seen, it has been disabled by default – sometimes even with fairly non-subtle (but vague) warnings.
So: is there any issue I should be aware of in enabling VT? I assume it is only used when triggered deliberately by software such as VMware or Virtual PC. But what is the risk?
Perhaps it relates mainly to the early implementations where it was a bit experimental, but I’d love to know: is it generally safe?
The Blue Pill was a proof of concept, that this could be potentially used by malware, making that malware completely invisible to the OS.
Check more discussion of this question.
Related posts:
- Enabling Hyper-V in HP Z800 BIOS
- Hardware/BIOS Monitoring Tools with Email or other Reporting Functionality
- Using 3TB HDD as boot drive on non-EFI BIOS
- Virtualisation server for a small business: questions on design, hardware components and vendor
- How do I know if my Xeon Processor supports hardware virtualisation?
Leave a comment
Recent Posts
Tags
active-directory
amazon-ec2
apache
apache2
backup
bash
centos
cisco
command-line
debian
dns
email
exchange
firewall
iis
iis7
iptables
linux
macosx
monitoring
mysql
networking
nginx
performance
permissions
php
postfix
raid
security
sql-server
sql-server-2005
sql-server-2008
ssh
ssl
ubuntu
unix
virtualization
vpn
webserver
windows
windows-7
windows-server-2003
windows-server-2008
windows-server-2008-r2
windows-xp





